Last edited by Tuktilar
Sunday, July 26, 2020 | History

2 edition of Soviet agrarian debate found in the catalog.

Soviet agrarian debate

Susan Gross Solomon

Soviet agrarian debate

a controversy in social science, 1923-1929.

by Susan Gross Solomon

  • 119 Want to read
  • 20 Currently reading

Published by Westview Press in Boulder, Col .
Written in English


Edition Notes

Published under the auspices of the Research Institute on International Change, Columbia University and the Russian Institute, Columbia University.

SeriesWestview special studies on the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe
ContributionsColumbia University. Research Institute on International Change., Columbia University. Russian Institute.
ID Numbers
Open LibraryOL13671266M

Rural Women in the Soviet Union and Post-Soviet Russia By Liubov Denisova farm girls to agrarian professionals to prostitutes and paints a unique picture of rural women’s life in the Soviet Union and post-Soviet Russia. Table of Contents This is an important book that will simulate debate on women's position under both the Soviet. Debate of agrarian change in the early decades of independence in Asia and Africa also highlighted a central tension between, on one side, those for whom modernization was a necessary component of agricultural growth, and its role in economic development more widely, requiring “peasant elimination” (Kitching, ) and, on the other side.

  So begins Bloodlands, a genuinely shattering report on the ideology, the political strategy, and the daily horror of Soviet and Nazi rule in the region that Timothy Snyder calls the bloodlands. In. The Soviet Union, officially the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR), was a federal socialist state in Northern Eurasia that existed from to and was the largest country in the world. Nominally a union of multiple national Soviet republics, in practice its government and economy were highly was a one-party state governed by the Soviet communist party, with Capital and largest city: Moscow, .

The Sino-Soviet split (–) was the breaking of political relations between the People's Republic of China (PRC) and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR), caused by doctrinal divergences that arose from their different interpretations and practical applications of Marxism–Leninism, as influenced by their respective geopolitics during the Cold War Caused by: De-Stalinization of the USSR, Marxist . Book Launch: The Global Farms Race -- Land Grabs, Agricultural Investment, and the Scramble for Food Security in Asia, Africa, Latin America, and the Former Soviet Union Designated by the Christian Science Monitor as one of 23 new foreign policy books that should have been read by the U.S. presidential candidates.


Share this book
You might also like
Determinants of the Japan premium

Determinants of the Japan premium

Principles of quantitative analysis

Principles of quantitative analysis

Kissing Judas

Kissing Judas

Bulletin Zechariah 4:6

Bulletin Zechariah 4:6

Features of a participatory management information system for rural development projects

Features of a participatory management information system for rural development projects

Creating A Charmed life - Hallmark edition

Creating A Charmed life - Hallmark edition

An Evaluation of the Housing Corporation rural programme

An Evaluation of the Housing Corporation rural programme

One Jump Ahead of Death.

One Jump Ahead of Death.

Diseases of fishes

Diseases of fishes

The Collins field guide to the mammals of Africa including Madagascar

The Collins field guide to the mammals of Africa including Madagascar

Nanocosm

Nanocosm

Soviet agrarian debate by Susan Gross Solomon Download PDF EPUB FB2

Get this from a library. The Soviet agrarian debate: a controversy in social science, [Susan Gross Solomon; Columbia University. Research Institute on International Change.; Columbia University.

Russian Institute.]. The book was a sharp-elbowed intervention in the decades-old debate between “totalitarian” historians, who saw in the Soviet Union an omnipotent state imposing its will on a defenseless. Agrarian Policies in Communist Europe Vol. 1 (Studies in East European and Soviet Russian Agrarian Policy): Business Development Books @ ce: $ Get this from a library.

SOVIET AGRARIAN DEBATE: a CONTROVERSY IN SOCIAL SCIENCE [Susan Gross Solomon; Columbia University. Research Institute on International Soviet agrarian debate book Columbia University.

Russian Institute.] -- The first decade of Soviet cultural life was marked by a pluralism unmatched in the subsequent history of the USSR. In many fields of art. The Socialist Revolutionary Party was a major political party in early 20th century Russia and a key player in the Russian the February Revolution of it shared power with other liberal Soviet agrarian debate book democratic socialist forces within the Russian Provisional Government.

In Novemberit won a plurality of the national vote in Russia's first-ever democratic. TITLE: Agrarian Interests and the Politics o f Reform in Post-Soviet Russia AUTHOR: Don Van Atta Duke University THE NATIONAL COUNCI L FOR SOVIET AND EAST EUROPEAN RESEARCH Massachusetts Avenue, N.W.

Washington, D.C. in detail the often bitter debates between the "agrarian Marxists" and the neo-populists in her book, The Soviet Agrarian Debate: A Controversy in Social Science, (Boulder, ). Danilov offers a well-balanced assessment from the Soviet perspective in his stimulating monograph, Sovetskaya dokolkhoznaya derevnya: Nase.

The Brenner debate was a major debate amongst Marxist historians during the late s and early s, regarding the origins of capitalism. It began with a journal article by Robert Brenner. Historians Trevor Aston and C. Philpin () characterised the debate as 'one of the most important historical debates of recent years'.

71 Corni and Gies see agrarian goals and Nazi expansionist policy as inseparable; they do not agree, however, that the war was started for economic reasons. According to these authors, the food planners of the Nazi regime used the ideological war to exploit food resources in the Soviet Union.

Ibid.,Cited by: 3. The industrialization debate of the mids was a key turning point in the history of the Soviet Union, and more broadly, of socialism. For better or for worse, the outcome of the debate over the pace of industrialization, sources of investment, pricing and wages policies, and other related matters would determine the Soviet Union’s answer.

After World War II, the Eastern European nations under Communist rule implemented agrarian reforms following the Soviet model. Since the collapse of Communist rule in Eastern Europe (–90) and the disintegration of the Soviet Union () there has been movement, sometimes successful, sometimes fitful, toward privatization of agriculture.

The sixties and seventies saw a wide-ranging debate on the growth of capitalist production in Indian agriculture, which soon became known as "the mode of production" debate.

This book brings together a selection of the articles which constituted the corpus of the : Hardcover. Since this is a discussion of a book about Stalin and the Soviet Union, the German debate need not detain us further, save to note that Russian extremists have put forward a mirror image of the German argument: Stalin, realizing he was about to be attacked by Hitler, mobilized his army on the border for a preemptive assault.

The Paperback of the The Chinese Debate about Soviet Socialism, by Gilbert Rozman at Barnes & Noble. FREE Shipping on $35 or more. Get FREE SHIPPING on Orders of $35+ Customer information on COVID B&N Outlet Membership Educators Gift Cards Stores & Events HelpAuthor: Gilbert Rozman.

This book is the first to investigate the gap between the plans and the reality of the Soviet Union’s mid-twentieth-century project to industrialize and modernize its agricultural system.

Historians agree that the project failed badly: agriculture was inefficient, unpredictable, and environmentally devastating for the entire Soviet period. Slavonic and East European Review, 'Agrarian Reform in Russia: The Road from Serfdom is a broad-reaching, ambitious survey and analysis of agricultural change and reform in Russia from the emancipation of to the present day â Š Anyone interested in the fascinating debate on the rural commune's origin, development, functioning, and legacy.

Maurice Dobb's Soviet Economic Development sincefirst published in prior to collectivisation (before going on to multiple editions). Alec Nove's Economic History of the Soviet Union () had only recently been published. Dobb's book, more than any other, imparted the conventional wisdom of the day.

While it was a. This is an interesting look back at the complex, sophisticated, and entrenched system of propaganda engines that ran the Soviet State. Though the book is outdated in the sense that it was published in and its analysis of propaganda stops there, it is valuable as a history book when comparing means of disseminating propaganda today against those of the past, /5.

Russian Agrarian History and Soviet Debates on the Peasantry. The Soviet Industrialization Debate. and a book called simply "Leninism". Said publications and a series of public speeches built around them plundered Lenin's writings for anti-kulak sentiments.

Zinoviev's researches managed to come up with such literary and philosophical. The Agrarian Question in Russia. Published: Trudovaya Pravda No.

22, J Published according to the text in Trudovaya Pravda. Source: Lenin Collected Works, Progress Publishers,Moscow, Vol pages Translated: Bernard Isaacs and The Late Joe Fineberg Transcription\Markup: R.

Cymbala. This is the first book to analyze the relationship between the Soviet state and society from the October Revolution of to the revolution under Stalin of the late s and early s. Professor Lewis Siegelbaum explores the evolution of the ruling Communist Party and its New Economic Policy and the changing fortunes of industrial workers, peasants, and the scientific.

Throughout the book, the authors return to the question of the so-called “economic calculation debate” which questioned whether planning a national-scale economy is possible. This debate arose largely because of the rise of the Soviet Union, which seemed in the early 20th century to demonstrate the viability of large-scale planning.

The late twenties and early thirties were perhaps the most transformative period in Soviet history. It was during this period Stalin consolidated his grip on power and was allowed to rule with impunity, instituting his “revolution from above” on the Soviet people.

He actively transformed the culture of the time, giving birth to a new Russian nationalism, rejecting the Author: Joshua R Keefe.